Quantcast
Channel: Why doesn't GCC optimize a*a*a*a*a*a to (a*a*a)*(a*a*a)? - Stack Overflow
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 13

Answer by picomancer for Why doesn't GCC optimize a*a*a*a*a*a to (a*a*a)*(a*a*a)?

$
0
0

GCC does actually optimize a*a*a*a*a*a to (a*a*a)*(a*a*a) when a is an integer. I tried with this command:

$ echo 'int f(int x) { return x*x*x*x*x*x; }' | gcc -o - -O2 -S -masm=intel -x c -

There are a lot of gcc flags but nothing fancy. They mean: Read from stdin; use O2 optimization level; output assembly language listing instead of a binary; the listing should use Intel assembly language syntax; the input is in C language (usually language is inferred from input file extension, but there is no file extension when reading from stdin); and write to stdout.

Here's the important part of the output. I've annotated it with some comments indicating what's going on in the assembly language:

; x is in edi to begin with.  eax will be used as a temporary register.
mov  eax, edi  ; temp = x
imul eax, edi  ; temp = x * temp
imul eax, edi  ; temp = x * temp
imul eax, eax  ; temp = temp * temp

I'm using system GCC on Linux Mint 16 Petra, an Ubuntu derivative. Here's the gcc version:

$ gcc --version
gcc (Ubuntu/Linaro 4.8.1-10ubuntu9) 4.8.1

As other posters have noted, this option is not possible in floating point, because floating point arithmetic is not associative.


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 13

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>